5G Coverage vs Capacity Tradeoff
5G was marketed as revolutionary — 100x faster than 4G, enabling autonomous vehicles, remote surgery, and IoT at scale. Carriers spent $100B+ on spectrum and deployment. But 5G comes in three flavors with very different characteristics. Low-band 5G is barely faster than 4G. Mid-band offers meaningful improvement but requires 3-4x more cell sites. High-band mmWave delivers the promised speeds but has a range of only 500 meters and can't penetrate walls. The 5G that was marketed — multi-gigabit speeds everywhere — is physically impossible without a cell site on every block. Most consumers experience 5G as a slightly faster version of 4G with a new icon on their phone. The revolutionary use cases (remote surgery, autonomous vehicles) require the mmWave variant that covers less than 1% of the country.
What people believe
“5G provides dramatically faster internet for everyone.”
| Metric | Before | After | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average 5G speed (real-world) | 4G: 30-50 Mbps | 5G: 50-200 Mbps (low/mid-band) | +100-300% |
| mmWave coverage | N/A | <1% of coverage area | Negligible |
| Carrier infrastructure investment | 4G baseline | $100B+ for 5G | Massive |
| Revolutionary use cases enabled | Promised many | Near zero at scale | Unfulfilled |
Don't If
- •You're building applications that depend on mmWave 5G speeds being available everywhere
- •Your business case assumes 5G coverage equals 5G capacity
If You Must
- 1.Design applications for mid-band 5G speeds, not mmWave theoretical maximums
- 2.Build fallback to 4G for any application requiring reliability
- 3.Focus on 5G benefits that work with mid-band: capacity for dense areas, improved latency
- 4.Don't promise consumers revolutionary experiences that require mmWave
Alternatives
- 4G LTE Advanced — Continued 4G investment provides 80% of 5G benefits at fraction of cost
- Wi-Fi 6E/7 — For indoor high-speed needs, Wi-Fi is more practical than 5G
- Fixed wireless access — 5G for home internet in underserved areas — a practical use case
This analysis is wrong if:
- mmWave 5G achieves coverage comparable to mid-band within 5 years of deployment
- 5G enables at least one revolutionary use case (remote surgery, autonomous vehicles) at commercial scale
- Average real-world 5G speeds exceed 1 Gbps for majority of users
- 1.Ookla Speedtest: 5G Performance Report
Real-world 5G speeds averaging 50-200 Mbps, far below marketed multi-gigabit claims
- 2.GSMA: 5G Deployment Economics
Analysis showing 3-4x more cell sites needed for equivalent mid-band 5G coverage vs 4G
- 3.IEEE: 5G mmWave Propagation Challenges
Technical analysis of mmWave range limitations and building penetration failures
- 4.Deloitte: 5G Reality Check
Assessment showing gap between 5G marketing promises and real-world consumer experience
This is a mirror — it shows what's already true.
Want to surface the hidden consequences of your infrastructure bets?