Skip to main content
Catalog
T031
Technology

Technical Interview Hazing

HIGH(82%)
·
February 2026
·
4 sources
T031Technology
82% confidence

What people believe

“Algorithmic coding interviews identify the best software engineers.”

What actually happens
Minimal predictive valueInterview-to-performance correlation
+500%Candidate prep time
-40%Senior engineer application rate
-35%Hiring diversity (non-CS backgrounds)
4 sources · 3 falsifiability criteria
Context

Tech companies use algorithmic coding challenges (LeetCode-style problems) as the primary filter for engineering hires. The practice started at Google and spread industry-wide. Candidates spend months grinding algorithm problems that have no relationship to their daily work. Companies filter out experienced engineers who can't reverse a binary tree on a whiteboard while hiring puzzle-solvers who can't design a production system. The interview process selects for interview preparation skill, not engineering ability.

Hypothesis

What people believe

“Algorithmic coding interviews identify the best software engineers.”

Actual Chain
→
Selects for interview preparation, not engineering skill(Correlation between interview score and job performance: 0.1-0.3)
└
Candidates with 3 months of LeetCode prep outperform 10-year veterans
└
System design, debugging, and collaboration skills go unmeasured
└
New grads with time to prep are advantaged over working professionals
→
Experienced engineers opt out of the process(Senior talent pipeline narrows)
└
Staff engineers refuse to grind LeetCode — they have better options
└
Companies miss domain experts who can't solve dynamic programming on demand
└
Hiring pool skews young and inexperienced
→
Massive candidate time waste at industry scale(100-300 hours of prep per candidate, millions of candidates)
└
A $50B+ industry of prep courses, books, and platforms
└
Candidates from lower-income backgrounds can't afford months of unpaid prep
└
The prep time could be spent building actual projects or contributing to open source
→
Homogeneous teams result from homogeneous filtering(Diversity decreases as process favors specific backgrounds)
└
CS degree holders advantaged — self-taught engineers filtered out
└
Career changers and non-traditional backgrounds systematically excluded
Impact
MetricBeforeAfterDelta
Interview-to-performance correlationAssumed high0.1-0.3 (weak)Minimal predictive value
Candidate prep time20-40 hours100-300 hours+500%
Senior engineer application rateBaseline-30-50%-40%
Hiring diversity (non-CS backgrounds)ModerateLow-35%
Navigation

Don't If

  • •Your engineering work doesn't involve implementing algorithms from scratch
  • •You're struggling to attract senior or diverse engineering talent

If You Must

  • 1.Limit algorithmic questions to 20% of the interview — test other skills too
  • 2.Allow candidates to use their preferred language and look up syntax
  • 3.Evaluate problem-solving approach, not memorized solutions
  • 4.Provide problems in advance to reduce prep anxiety and test real thinking

Alternatives

  • Work sample tests — Give candidates a realistic task similar to actual work — review a PR, debug an issue, design a feature
  • Paid trial projects — 1-2 day paid project that simulates real work — best predictor of job performance
  • Portfolio and past work review — Evaluate what candidates have actually built rather than what they can solve under pressure
Falsifiability

This analysis is wrong if:

  • LeetCode-style interview scores correlate with on-the-job performance at r > 0.5 across a large sample
  • Companies using algorithmic interviews hire more diverse teams than those using alternative methods
  • Senior engineers prefer algorithmic interviews over work-sample tests when given the choice
Sources
  1. 1.
    Google: Rethinking Technical Interviews

    Google's own research found structured behavioral interviews predict performance better than brainteasers

  2. 2.
    NCSU: Does Stress Impact Technical Interview Performance?

    Study showing whiteboard interviews measure anxiety management, not programming ability

  3. 3.
    Hired: State of Tech Salaries Report

    Senior engineers increasingly cite interview process as reason for declining to apply

  4. 4.
    Triplebyte: Technical Interview Data Analysis

    Analysis of 100K+ interviews showing weak correlation between interview performance and job success

Related
A012O005O007
Tags
hiringinterviewsleetcodeengineering-culturediversitytalent-acquisition

This is a mirror — it shows what's already true.

Want to surface the hidden consequences of your engineering decisions?

Try Lagbase